Co-creation of Tools for Inclusive Cities

Human interactions are constantly taking place in physical spaces. Whether these are public or private, spaces are often (re)adapting its features to express the needs of those who are using them. In this line, public spaces can be seen as a unique canvas where culture, history, politics, economy and daily socio-intersectional issues are framed as a manifestation of collective resilience, adaptability, and resistance. Therefore, the importance of adopting a human scale and inclusive standpoint when putting into practice urban development practices for better cities.  Huasipichanga and La Scuola Open Source, a space dedicated to social and technological innovation to perform educational activities, cultural performances and research projects, have joined efforts to conduct  a three day full immersion workshop on inclusive cities. The aim of this workshop is for participants to understand and experience how different social actors can live cities differently to foster both awareness and the implementation of effective inclusive practices in urban development interventions.

 

THE WORKSHOP

Background

Audience: a total of 6 participants - architects/landscape designers, urban planning students, placemakers, city makers, and psychotherapists from Italy, Germany, and Mexico.Time: a three-day workshop, whose content is structured based on theories, data collection, and analysis-proposal.
Objectives

  1. Sharing knowledge about the co-creation process and its application.

  2. Development of collaborative tools to understand, map, and enhance socio-spatial issues in Bari, Italy.

 

METHODOLOGY

logo (4).png

SCREENING

DAY 1:

Theories, concepts and space experienceThe first day focused on sharing theoretical content. The taught theories and concepts are:

  • Inclusivity

  • Collaborative design

  • Human-scale perspective and Child-friendly cities

  • Huasipichanga Methodology

The goal of these sessions was to inform participants about the current trends in urban planning and development from a collaborative working approach.
At the end of the first day, a walkshop around Bari was organized to discover the city and get insights into residents’ interaction with their environment from diverse and unique perspectives.


logo (4).png

PICTURING

DAY 2:

Start with  the co-creation processAfter standing on stage during most of the first day, the second day is all about the participants playing the leading role. They were asked to present their home cities and identify three challenges. The second session of the day started with a short presentation. We shared knowledge about participatory tools to map spaces for inclusive cities, used for the data collection starting that day, and concluded the following morning.

Afterward, the participants got to split into two groups to identify a particular urban-related challenge in Bari, choose an adequate co-creation process, and participatory tools that could tackle the chosen issue. As a result, mobility and identity were the challenges chosen by the participants to analyze. On this note, they developed two strategies to understand how to approach and intervene Giardino Garibaldi, located nearby La Scuola Open Source and Via Sparano da Bari e Corso Vittorio Emanuele, a pedestrian street with a map of Bari design on the ground.


ZOOMING IN

logo (1).png

CAPTURING

logo.png

REVEALING

Day 3:

Development and completion of the co-creation process to tackle urban issues in Bari.

The third day starts with an introduction about what is ethnographic research and in particular, what is the role of makers and researchers during the fieldwork phase of a project.

This theoretical insight helps the participants to intervene in the selected areas and conclude the data collection. The main tools used are interviews, playful workshops, observation, and surveys. This information was analysed and developed in a high-level proposal, presented and discussed in a collaborative group session.

The workshop concluded with an open conversation about the process, impact, and outcome evaluation of the project exercise and, of course, with a Huasipichanga celebration.

IMG-20191110-WA0068.jpg
IMG-20191110-WA0083.jpg


logo (2).png

ZOOMING OUT

Recommendations based on the evaluation of the workshop: Based on the evaluation form shared among the participants, the workshop can be defined as successful. The gathered answers show that all the participants express positive evaluations in regards to the WS content and structure, the communication with the lecturers, and their knowledge. A total score of 4,5 represents the level of expectation fulfillment, where 5 is the maximum score. However, there is always room for improvement regarding logistics (registration, payment, organization, etc.), as well as the communication with the local partners, La Scuola Open Source. Among all the participants’ comments and recommendations, we find the following the most relevant to improve the workshop for future events:“The outcome and the interaction of the WS were influenced by the number of participants; a group of 15 would have been perfect.”“It would be precious to spend more time working directly on-site and with users.”“Addressing the last session to an actual occurring problem or a problematic area in the city of the workshop.”

Follow up action plan to contribute further to the project’s objectives : In light of the workshop objectives and Huasipichanga mission, an action plan is under development to improve the quality of the activity and define the strategic partner for an effective dissemination campaign. The current focus stands on developing a strategy to address diverse target groups, from the public sector to educational institutions, located in the Global South.